Jan. 12, 2026

Puppy Justice Wins! -- Beagle Rescuers NOT GUILTY

Puppy Justice Wins! -- Beagle Rescuers NOT GUILTY

In a stunning and historic development for the global animal rights movement, the defendants in the second Animal Rising beagle rescue trial in Cambridgeshire, England, have been found NOT GUILTY. The verdict marks a dramatic reversal from the first trial connected to the same campaign, where a separate group of activists were convicted—sending shockwaves through advocacy communities worldwide.

This case centered on the rescue of beagles from a breeding facility supplying animals for laboratory experimentation. Beagles, known for their gentle temperament and trust in humans, are among the most commonly used dogs in animal testing. For years, campaigners have argued that these facilities operate behind closed doors, shielded from public scrutiny, while animals endure lifelong confinement and suffering.

The acquittal is being hailed as a major victory for animal rights, not only because it frees the defendants, but because it sends a powerful signal: juries are increasingly willing to scrutinize the moral and ethical dimensions of laws that criminalize compassion while protecting institutional cruelty. The contrast between the guilty verdicts in the first trial and today's not-guilty outcome underscores a growing public unease with the criminalization of nonviolent rescue efforts.

Now, we are bringing you LIVE analysis and insight from one of the most influential figures in the modern animal rights movement—attorney Wayne Hsiung, founder of Simple Heart and co-founder of Direct Action Everywhere. Wayne is widely regarded as the founder of the Open Rescue movement, a strategy rooted in transparency, nonviolence, and the moral conviction that rescuing suffering animals is not a crime, but a duty.

Wayne Hsiung brings a rare and deeply informed perspective to this moment. In the United States, he was convicted and served time in connection with open rescue actions—cases that helped ignite international debate over animal protection laws, whistleblower suppression, and the legitimacy of civil disobedience on behalf of animals. His legal battles have shaped the movement and forced courts, lawmakers, and the public to confront an uncomfortable question: when laws protect cruelty, is breaking them an act of justice?

As the world watches the implications of this UK verdict ripple outward, we are honored to speak with Wayne Hsiung LIVE about what this decision means—for the defendants, for future animal rescue actions, and for the rapidly evolving legal and moral landscape of animal rights worldwide.

This is not just a court ruling.
It is a turning point.

For more, visit: https://www.animalrising.org/

1
00:00:00,140 --> 00:00:04,040
of England, the Animal Rising Trial.

2
00:00:04,480 --> 00:00:06,480
And we are live with Wayne Chung, who's

3
00:00:06,480 --> 00:00:09,680
considered the founder of the Open Rescue Movement,

4
00:00:09,880 --> 00:00:13,360
talking about this not guilty verdict that has

5
00:00:13,360 --> 00:00:14,420
just come in.

6
00:00:14,840 --> 00:00:17,160
There you see the four defendants.

7
00:00:17,760 --> 00:00:21,380
This is a huge animal rights victory, and

8
00:00:21,380 --> 00:00:24,180
it concerns basically a series of trials which

9
00:00:24,180 --> 00:00:27,340
formed the first open rescue trials in the

10
00:00:27,340 --> 00:00:28,200
United Kingdom.

11
00:00:28,380 --> 00:00:31,600
This is all happening near Cambridge University.

12
00:00:32,160 --> 00:00:36,220
You can see they're probably 50 minutes or

13
00:00:36,220 --> 00:00:38,580
less from London, England.

14
00:00:39,380 --> 00:00:43,680
The first group of defendants, there's so many,

15
00:00:43,800 --> 00:00:46,420
18, that they did several trials.

16
00:00:46,580 --> 00:00:49,500
The first trial resulted in guilty verdicts, but

17
00:00:49,500 --> 00:00:54,220
now we're learning that the newest trial, the

18
00:00:54,220 --> 00:00:58,380
latest trial has resulted in not guilty verdicts.

19
00:00:58,480 --> 00:01:00,140
Wayne Chung, you were in court.

20
00:01:00,520 --> 00:01:02,520
Tell us the entire thing.

21
00:01:02,620 --> 00:01:05,360
I mean, this is huge, huge news for

22
00:01:05,360 --> 00:01:06,340
the animal rights movement.

23
00:01:06,960 --> 00:01:08,940
Yeah, Jane, it was a complete rollercoaster because

24
00:01:08,940 --> 00:01:11,820
frankly, the prosecutor's pretty effective, and he made

25
00:01:11,820 --> 00:01:14,420
arguments about how the entire society was gonna

26
00:01:14,420 --> 00:01:16,700
break down, social order would break down, that

27
00:01:16,700 --> 00:01:18,960
there would be anarchy on the streets if

28
00:01:18,960 --> 00:01:19,760
the jury quit it.

29
00:01:20,260 --> 00:01:22,960
He did everything he could to paint these

30
00:01:22,960 --> 00:01:25,060
people as extremists, and frankly, I think the

31
00:01:25,060 --> 00:01:25,920
judge was on his side.

32
00:01:26,020 --> 00:01:28,060
There was a point where the judge indicated

33
00:01:28,060 --> 00:01:30,260
to the jury that everything MBR did was

34
00:01:30,260 --> 00:01:32,920
legal, which I thought was biased and just

35
00:01:32,920 --> 00:01:35,380
frankly incorrect, legally and factually.

36
00:01:35,580 --> 00:01:37,660
MBR does lots of illegal things.

37
00:01:37,780 --> 00:01:40,520
MBR is the vivisection facility at issue in

38
00:01:40,520 --> 00:01:42,900
this case, but the lawyers did just an

39
00:01:42,900 --> 00:01:44,960
extraordinary job of breaking down the legal arguments

40
00:01:44,960 --> 00:01:47,860
and arguing effectively that the defendants all acted

41
00:01:47,860 --> 00:01:49,840
honestly, which is one of the elements of

42
00:01:49,840 --> 00:01:51,500
a theft charge or a burglary charge in

43
00:01:51,500 --> 00:01:53,880
the United Kingdom, and then the self-representative

44
00:01:53,880 --> 00:01:55,080
defendant just knocked out of the park.

45
00:01:55,200 --> 00:01:56,640
There were tears in everyone's eyes when he

46
00:01:56,640 --> 00:01:58,540
gave his statement, and I think the key

47
00:01:58,540 --> 00:02:01,180
moment for him was when he directly challenged

48
00:02:01,180 --> 00:02:05,000
the prosecution's argument that the dogs were similar

49
00:02:05,000 --> 00:02:06,340
to a can of beans.

50
00:02:06,540 --> 00:02:08,340
That's literally what the prosecutor said, just like

51
00:02:08,340 --> 00:02:10,680
you can't steal a can of beans, you

52
00:02:10,680 --> 00:02:13,120
cannot steal a dog from a vivisection facility,

53
00:02:13,620 --> 00:02:16,200
and Tom stated very directly, I just do

54
00:02:16,200 --> 00:02:17,340
not agree with that, and I don't think

55
00:02:17,340 --> 00:02:19,760
you do either, because dogs are not cans

56
00:02:19,760 --> 00:02:20,220
of beans.

57
00:02:20,540 --> 00:02:23,340
They're living beings who deserve love, and so

58
00:02:23,340 --> 00:02:24,520
many of us said just tears in our

59
00:02:24,520 --> 00:02:25,780
eyes at the end of his statement, and

60
00:02:25,780 --> 00:02:28,160
honestly, I felt like even though the prosecutor

61
00:02:28,160 --> 00:02:29,800
was pretty effective, even though the judge was

62
00:02:29,800 --> 00:02:31,960
biased against us, when I looked at the

63
00:02:31,960 --> 00:02:33,940
jury's faces, I thought we were gonna win,

64
00:02:34,060 --> 00:02:35,060
and that's exactly what happened.

65
00:02:35,720 --> 00:02:38,440
Well, you're looking at video of some of

66
00:02:38,440 --> 00:02:39,540
the beagles who were rescued.

67
00:02:39,720 --> 00:02:40,240
There they are.

68
00:02:40,320 --> 00:02:41,300
You see the feces.

69
00:02:41,300 --> 00:02:46,020
You see the, just, well, the innocence of

70
00:02:46,020 --> 00:02:46,820
these animals.

71
00:02:47,300 --> 00:02:50,940
Approximately 20 beagles were rescued from this breeding

72
00:02:50,940 --> 00:02:51,500
facility.

73
00:02:51,760 --> 00:02:54,880
Two were, you might say, recaptured by authorities,

74
00:02:55,280 --> 00:02:59,380
and 18 rescuers went on trial.

75
00:03:00,060 --> 00:03:03,080
This is the first open rescue group of

76
00:03:03,080 --> 00:03:06,120
trials in the United Kingdom, and what's very

77
00:03:06,120 --> 00:03:10,420
interesting is that the first trial resulted in

78
00:03:10,420 --> 00:03:13,340
guilty verdicts, and people were devastated.

79
00:03:13,940 --> 00:03:17,400
The second trial, which just ended, resulted in

80
00:03:17,400 --> 00:03:19,800
not guilty verdicts, so what was the difference

81
00:03:19,800 --> 00:03:22,960
between the two cases where one is guilty

82
00:03:22,960 --> 00:03:27,040
and the other, the jury facing, well, the

83
00:03:27,040 --> 00:03:29,840
same situation, they're dealing with the same rescue,

84
00:03:30,020 --> 00:03:30,920
finds not guilty?

85
00:03:31,640 --> 00:03:33,220
Yeah, I think there were two big things,

86
00:03:33,640 --> 00:03:35,380
and for the record, I was not there

87
00:03:35,380 --> 00:03:36,380
at all in the first trial, and the

88
00:03:36,380 --> 00:03:37,580
second trial, I was only there for one

89
00:03:37,580 --> 00:03:39,520
day, closing argument, but I have been very

90
00:03:39,520 --> 00:03:42,040
much in touch with the support team, some

91
00:03:42,040 --> 00:03:42,600
of the lawyers.

92
00:03:42,780 --> 00:03:44,820
We did a big debrief after the first

93
00:03:44,820 --> 00:03:47,580
animal rising trial, and I think the first

94
00:03:47,580 --> 00:03:49,780
big factor, frankly, was the judge just came

95
00:03:49,780 --> 00:03:50,720
to his senses a little bit.

96
00:03:50,780 --> 00:03:53,280
In the first trial, the judge literally shouted

97
00:03:53,280 --> 00:03:55,140
down some of the defendants, and shouted down

98
00:03:55,140 --> 00:03:56,700
and cut off one of the attorneys during

99
00:03:56,700 --> 00:03:59,380
closing argument, because they were trying to appeal

100
00:03:59,380 --> 00:04:00,120
to people's emotions.

101
00:04:00,280 --> 00:04:02,320
They were trying to, I think the line

102
00:04:02,320 --> 00:04:04,540
that actually led to the judge shutting down

103
00:04:04,540 --> 00:04:06,020
and closing argument was one of the attorneys

104
00:04:06,020 --> 00:04:08,700
said, imagine you had lived for 18 weeks

105
00:04:08,700 --> 00:04:10,860
of your life in conditions like this, and

106
00:04:10,860 --> 00:04:13,500
frankly, the defense should have been entitled to

107
00:04:13,500 --> 00:04:16,899
make that argument, but instead, the judge told

108
00:04:16,899 --> 00:04:19,420
the jury to leave the room, screamed at

109
00:04:19,420 --> 00:04:21,440
the attorney, threatened him, and said, you're not

110
00:04:21,440 --> 00:04:23,400
allowed to appeal to emotion at all, and

111
00:04:23,400 --> 00:04:24,820
which is just not true as a legal

112
00:04:24,820 --> 00:04:27,100
matter, and more importantly, one of the elements

113
00:04:27,100 --> 00:04:29,680
of the case is dishonesty, and for any

114
00:04:29,680 --> 00:04:31,700
of the defense lawyers, or the defendants themselves

115
00:04:31,700 --> 00:04:33,200
to make the case that they were acting

116
00:04:33,200 --> 00:04:35,620
honestly on the day of this rescue, they

117
00:04:35,620 --> 00:04:37,400
had to describe the reason for being there.

118
00:04:37,580 --> 00:04:39,800
They had to describe their concern about the

119
00:04:39,800 --> 00:04:42,580
abuses that were being inflicted on the MBR

120
00:04:42,580 --> 00:04:45,900
dogs, and so my perspective is the judge

121
00:04:45,900 --> 00:04:47,860
got this wrong, and frankly, the judge may

122
00:04:47,860 --> 00:04:49,540
have realized that himself, because in this case,

123
00:04:49,740 --> 00:04:51,660
he gave the defendants a little bit of

124
00:04:51,660 --> 00:04:53,320
a longer leash in terms of what they're

125
00:04:53,320 --> 00:04:55,580
allowed to say about the conditions at MBR,

126
00:04:55,980 --> 00:04:58,080
the experimentation that happened to these beagles, and

127
00:04:58,080 --> 00:04:59,320
some of the stuff that happens is just

128
00:04:59,320 --> 00:04:59,560
evil.

129
00:04:59,560 --> 00:05:02,320
You know, basically bleeding out these beagles to

130
00:05:02,320 --> 00:05:04,460
every last drop of blood, slowly taking all

131
00:05:04,460 --> 00:05:07,000
the blood away for experiments, so using this

132
00:05:07,000 --> 00:05:09,280
blood for various things, and then harvesting all

133
00:05:09,280 --> 00:05:11,240
their organs, bio-harvesting all their organs for

134
00:05:11,240 --> 00:05:13,100
various experiments, so just bleeding these dogs out,

135
00:05:13,320 --> 00:05:15,680
then selling the dog's organs to all sorts

136
00:05:15,680 --> 00:05:16,780
of experimentation facilities.

137
00:05:17,200 --> 00:05:18,000
So that's one big factor.

138
00:05:18,080 --> 00:05:19,480
The judge kind of came to his senses

139
00:05:19,480 --> 00:05:22,100
and realized, look, I have to give these

140
00:05:22,100 --> 00:05:24,420
people the right to defend themselves, which includes

141
00:05:24,420 --> 00:05:26,660
talking about the reasons for being there, but

142
00:05:26,660 --> 00:05:27,920
the other big factor is I think that

143
00:05:27,920 --> 00:05:29,880
there was a lot more personal storytelling, that

144
00:05:29,880 --> 00:05:32,020
in the first case, it was too logical,

145
00:05:32,240 --> 00:05:34,440
too rational, and you and I know in

146
00:05:34,440 --> 00:05:36,900
the persuasion business, in the media business, in

147
00:05:36,900 --> 00:05:39,200
any sort of communications business, it's all about

148
00:05:39,200 --> 00:05:41,760
emotions and stories, and frankly, I think one

149
00:05:41,760 --> 00:05:44,160
of the reasons they relied on just reasons

150
00:05:44,160 --> 00:05:45,840
and abstract arguments in the first trial is

151
00:05:45,840 --> 00:05:48,080
because the judge was so hardcore about not

152
00:05:48,080 --> 00:05:50,080
allowing any emotion in the case, but in

153
00:05:50,080 --> 00:05:51,760
this case, it was extremely interesting.

154
00:05:52,240 --> 00:05:54,960
The prosecutor said at one point, there's no

155
00:05:54,960 --> 00:05:56,860
room for sympathy in the courtroom.

156
00:05:56,860 --> 00:05:58,240
He literally said those words, and I was

157
00:05:58,240 --> 00:05:59,780
kind of shocked because it's the sort of

158
00:05:59,780 --> 00:06:01,140
thing that you think of a villain from

159
00:06:01,140 --> 00:06:03,620
some movie, like an action movie villain would

160
00:06:03,620 --> 00:06:05,200
say, there's no room for sympathy in this

161
00:06:05,200 --> 00:06:05,520
courtroom.

162
00:06:05,700 --> 00:06:07,120
There's no room for, because sympathy is a

163
00:06:07,120 --> 00:06:07,520
good emotion.

164
00:06:07,640 --> 00:06:09,100
It's a good thing for our legal system

165
00:06:09,100 --> 00:06:10,660
to have, to imagine what it's like to

166
00:06:10,660 --> 00:06:13,320
be in someone else's shoes, but the defendants

167
00:06:13,320 --> 00:06:16,740
themselves did an extraordinary job of generating sympathy,

168
00:06:16,840 --> 00:06:19,260
not like directly appealing to sympathy, but just

169
00:06:19,260 --> 00:06:21,780
describing why they were there, describing how they

170
00:06:21,780 --> 00:06:23,860
felt, describing their backgrounds in a way that

171
00:06:23,860 --> 00:06:25,720
I think really moved the jury to very

172
00:06:25,720 --> 00:06:27,320
quickly render a verdict of not guilty.

173
00:06:27,380 --> 00:06:28,640
And I want to say, this is like

174
00:06:28,640 --> 00:06:29,540
a record verdict.

175
00:06:29,720 --> 00:06:32,220
I mean, I've been a lawyer for almost

176
00:06:32,220 --> 00:06:32,940
20 years now.

177
00:06:33,020 --> 00:06:33,940
Actually, it's over 20 years now.

178
00:06:34,640 --> 00:06:36,260
I've never seen a verdict come out this

179
00:06:36,260 --> 00:06:38,440
fast, and it came out this fast because

180
00:06:38,440 --> 00:06:41,440
the defendants did a good job of storytelling.

181
00:06:42,920 --> 00:06:45,260
You mentioned something that I thought was really

182
00:06:45,260 --> 00:06:50,080
interesting, that the prosecutor compared these dogs to

183
00:06:50,080 --> 00:06:53,820
a can of beans, and you, despite being

184
00:06:53,820 --> 00:06:57,900
a constitutional law professor and the founder or

185
00:06:57,900 --> 00:07:01,500
the inspiration of the open rescue movement in

186
00:07:01,500 --> 00:07:04,060
the United States, we are getting some comments,

187
00:07:04,080 --> 00:07:05,480
and people say, well, somebody was doing it

188
00:07:05,480 --> 00:07:05,900
in Australia.

189
00:07:06,220 --> 00:07:09,200
Absolutely, it's a joint team effort, but certainly

190
00:07:09,200 --> 00:07:12,660
you've been arrested and served time for involving

191
00:07:12,660 --> 00:07:14,720
open rescues in the United States.

192
00:07:15,200 --> 00:07:20,120
And one of the acquittals that you won

193
00:07:20,760 --> 00:07:24,960
involved a prosecutor using the same argument when

194
00:07:24,960 --> 00:07:27,720
it came to the rescue of little pigs

195
00:07:28,500 --> 00:07:31,200
from the Smithfield factory farm.

196
00:07:31,460 --> 00:07:36,500
Let's hear that prosecutor make that same comparing

197
00:07:36,500 --> 00:07:40,580
animals to inanimate objects argument in court.

198
00:07:40,780 --> 00:07:45,920
Analyze for just a moment the reasoning being

199
00:07:45,920 --> 00:07:47,200
demonstrated here tonight.

200
00:07:48,160 --> 00:07:50,080
I think it's clear that the pigs were

201
00:07:50,080 --> 00:07:52,640
stolen, they were taken, and they were not

202
00:07:52,640 --> 00:07:53,120
returned.

203
00:07:53,560 --> 00:07:55,940
In fact, Mr. Shum stated he didn't want

204
00:07:55,940 --> 00:07:56,520
to return them.

205
00:07:57,800 --> 00:07:58,260
That's that.

206
00:07:59,000 --> 00:08:01,320
Imagine the use of the word rescue in

207
00:08:01,320 --> 00:08:02,100
some other context.

208
00:08:02,280 --> 00:08:05,760
Suppose you were in the grocery store, and

209
00:08:05,760 --> 00:08:08,280
you saw a can with dents in it,

210
00:08:08,320 --> 00:08:09,900
and you thought to yourself, oh my goodness,

211
00:08:10,600 --> 00:08:11,960
that can has a dent, it has the

212
00:08:11,960 --> 00:08:13,040
potential of going bad.

213
00:08:13,080 --> 00:08:14,700
I better rescue that can, put it in

214
00:08:14,700 --> 00:08:16,160
my purse, take it out of the store.

215
00:08:18,760 --> 00:08:22,080
Or imagine your DQ, you see a dripping

216
00:08:22,080 --> 00:08:24,180
ice cream cone up there, the clerk just

217
00:08:24,180 --> 00:08:25,540
put it on the counter, oh dear, that

218
00:08:25,540 --> 00:08:27,020
cone is dripping off the side.

219
00:08:27,400 --> 00:08:29,260
I better take it so that it doesn't

220
00:08:29,260 --> 00:08:30,600
make a mess on the floor.

221
00:08:32,120 --> 00:08:35,260
So that was the argument that was used

222
00:08:35,260 --> 00:08:36,679
by the prosecutor against you.

223
00:08:36,799 --> 00:08:41,440
You won that case, and the British prosecutors

224
00:08:41,440 --> 00:08:47,140
used the can metaphor analogy again, and they

225
00:08:47,140 --> 00:08:47,760
lost.

226
00:08:47,920 --> 00:08:49,920
So what's your takeaway there?

227
00:08:50,700 --> 00:08:52,640
The first thing is my jaw just dropped.

228
00:08:52,740 --> 00:08:53,840
I couldn't believe what I was hearing.

229
00:08:53,940 --> 00:08:55,520
It was like deja vu all over again,

230
00:08:55,580 --> 00:08:57,440
because I thought it was such a terrible

231
00:08:57,440 --> 00:08:58,940
comparison to make in our trial.

232
00:08:59,220 --> 00:09:00,980
We actually talked to all the jurors in

233
00:09:00,980 --> 00:09:02,440
that case, which no one thought were gonna

234
00:09:02,440 --> 00:09:02,680
win.

235
00:09:02,920 --> 00:09:05,080
My attorney in Utah thought this case is

236
00:09:05,080 --> 00:09:05,360
hopeless.

237
00:09:05,500 --> 00:09:07,140
This is like 90% Trump County.

238
00:09:07,620 --> 00:09:08,980
One third of the people in the entire

239
00:09:08,980 --> 00:09:11,940
county work for Smithfield Foods, the company that

240
00:09:11,940 --> 00:09:13,360
we had quote unquote stolen the pigs from.

241
00:09:14,100 --> 00:09:15,660
And I think one of the reasons we

242
00:09:15,660 --> 00:09:18,220
won is because the absurdity of the industry's

243
00:09:18,220 --> 00:09:21,160
position becomes apparent once you actually are forced

244
00:09:21,160 --> 00:09:22,120
to deliberate about it.

245
00:09:22,740 --> 00:09:24,380
And the reality is for them to actually

246
00:09:24,380 --> 00:09:26,760
effectively accuse any animal rights activists who rescue

247
00:09:26,760 --> 00:09:29,060
animals of theft, they have to compare these

248
00:09:29,060 --> 00:09:31,240
animals to property, including a dented can.

249
00:09:31,380 --> 00:09:32,820
And that's what the prosecutor did today.

250
00:09:32,900 --> 00:09:34,700
He said, well, look, you might not agree

251
00:09:34,700 --> 00:09:35,320
with this industry.

252
00:09:35,400 --> 00:09:37,940
And I'll know this industry does treat animals

253
00:09:37,940 --> 00:09:39,660
like commodities, kind of like a can of

254
00:09:39,660 --> 00:09:39,900
beans.

255
00:09:40,240 --> 00:09:41,620
And I think he was trying to basically

256
00:09:41,620 --> 00:09:44,880
preview the personification we're gonna try and do

257
00:09:44,880 --> 00:09:47,400
and say, look, no, don't buy this idea

258
00:09:47,400 --> 00:09:49,720
that this is the same relationship that you

259
00:09:49,720 --> 00:09:50,880
have with your dog or cat at home.

260
00:09:50,920 --> 00:09:52,280
This is more like the way a company

261
00:09:52,280 --> 00:09:53,820
would see a can of beans.

262
00:09:54,240 --> 00:09:55,780
But the jury just revolted against it.

263
00:09:55,840 --> 00:09:58,280
And I actually was taking notes during the

264
00:09:58,280 --> 00:09:58,760
closing argument.

265
00:09:58,840 --> 00:10:00,580
I noted a number of the juries kind

266
00:10:00,580 --> 00:10:02,400
of like looked away and it wasn't as

267
00:10:02,400 --> 00:10:03,480
obvious as in my case.

268
00:10:03,520 --> 00:10:05,640
In my case, I think when Von Christensen,

269
00:10:05,800 --> 00:10:07,440
the prosecutor you just saw made that argument,

270
00:10:07,440 --> 00:10:09,340
I could just see the jury's eyes roll.

271
00:10:09,420 --> 00:10:10,300
And I was like, all right, I mean,

272
00:10:10,700 --> 00:10:12,080
I don't think we should be able to

273
00:10:12,080 --> 00:10:13,400
win this case, but I think they just

274
00:10:13,400 --> 00:10:14,620
kind of had an own goal.

275
00:10:14,760 --> 00:10:15,940
They just shot themselves in the foot.

276
00:10:16,520 --> 00:10:18,460
But in this case, it wasn't quite as

277
00:10:18,460 --> 00:10:19,640
obvious, but a number of the jurors were

278
00:10:19,640 --> 00:10:21,800
like rolling their eyes, looking away, just clearly

279
00:10:21,800 --> 00:10:23,620
not that engaged with the prosecutor's argument and

280
00:10:23,620 --> 00:10:24,400
went down that direction.

281
00:10:24,920 --> 00:10:27,420
And this has much bigger implications than two

282
00:10:27,420 --> 00:10:31,420
acquittals, because the idea behind this comparison is

283
00:10:31,420 --> 00:10:33,160
that animals are property.

284
00:10:33,820 --> 00:10:35,800
In contrast, what the animal rights movement believes

285
00:10:35,800 --> 00:10:37,480
is animals are persons.

286
00:10:38,120 --> 00:10:39,960
And this shows time and time again, that

287
00:10:39,960 --> 00:10:42,340
when jurors are actually forced to deliberate, they

288
00:10:42,340 --> 00:10:44,200
sided those who see the animals as persons

289
00:10:44,200 --> 00:10:44,840
and not property.

290
00:10:45,580 --> 00:10:48,540
So there's a couple more trials coming up.

291
00:10:48,660 --> 00:10:50,500
And I don't know if we're allowed to

292
00:10:50,500 --> 00:10:52,400
mention that you have a personal relationship with

293
00:10:52,400 --> 00:10:53,640
one of the defendants.

294
00:10:54,240 --> 00:10:56,420
You're married to one of the defendants.

295
00:10:56,440 --> 00:10:58,440
Is that okay to mention?

296
00:10:59,200 --> 00:11:01,320
Yeah, the best part, yeah, no, for sure.

297
00:11:01,700 --> 00:11:06,660
Yeah, and they have talked about how, well,

298
00:11:06,920 --> 00:11:09,800
what's at stake with this trial?

299
00:11:10,000 --> 00:11:14,300
Again, this is the first set of open

300
00:11:14,300 --> 00:11:18,280
rescue trials in the United Kingdom.

301
00:11:18,500 --> 00:11:21,420
So I'm gonna queue up when they're talking

302
00:11:21,920 --> 00:11:24,140
and let them talk for a little bit,

303
00:11:24,220 --> 00:11:25,740
because I think that there was a lot

304
00:11:25,740 --> 00:11:28,820
of optimism and shock after the first verdict.

305
00:11:29,520 --> 00:11:32,580
First optimism, yes, this is a no brainer.

306
00:11:32,700 --> 00:11:34,120
We had the best of intentions.

307
00:11:34,120 --> 00:11:37,040
We weren't going to steal property.

308
00:11:37,200 --> 00:11:38,560
We were going to rescue animals.

309
00:11:38,760 --> 00:11:40,440
And then there was shock when that didn't

310
00:11:40,440 --> 00:11:40,820
happen.

311
00:11:41,000 --> 00:11:44,320
But now there's a resurgence of optimism, I

312
00:11:44,320 --> 00:11:44,680
would hope.

313
00:11:44,780 --> 00:11:47,620
So let's listen to Ben Newman, the co

314
00:11:47,620 --> 00:11:50,300
-founder of Animal Rising and Rose Patterson.

315
00:11:50,940 --> 00:11:54,060
Both of them, Ben was, they're both part

316
00:11:54,060 --> 00:11:54,480
of this case.

317
00:11:54,600 --> 00:11:56,660
This is the first open rescue trial ever

318
00:11:56,660 --> 00:11:57,160
in the UK.

319
00:11:57,460 --> 00:11:59,420
So it's a historic event.

320
00:11:59,720 --> 00:12:01,140
And yeah, just a huge moment for the

321
00:12:01,140 --> 00:12:02,920
animal movement to draw more attention to animal

322
00:12:02,920 --> 00:12:06,000
testing and hopefully see the closure of NBR

323
00:12:06,000 --> 00:12:08,480
Acres very soon as the first step in

324
00:12:08,480 --> 00:12:09,580
ending all animal testing.

325
00:12:09,920 --> 00:12:11,200
And we're calling for the facility to be

326
00:12:11,200 --> 00:12:15,560
closed, long story short, and put animal testing,

327
00:12:16,540 --> 00:12:18,480
originally the concept of animal testing on trial,

328
00:12:18,620 --> 00:12:20,480
because we actually, I did it once in

329
00:12:20,480 --> 00:12:23,560
June, 2022, with three of us who did

330
00:12:23,560 --> 00:12:24,120
it accountably.

331
00:12:24,500 --> 00:12:27,240
And then the Crown Prosecution dropped the charges.

332
00:12:27,620 --> 00:12:28,780
They said, huge lack of evidence.

333
00:12:28,880 --> 00:12:30,800
So then we went back again in December,

334
00:12:31,040 --> 00:12:31,400
2022.

335
00:12:31,780 --> 00:12:33,340
And so what we're hoping is that we'll

336
00:12:33,340 --> 00:12:35,840
be found, obviously it's not guaranteed, but hoping

337
00:12:35,840 --> 00:12:37,740
we'll be found not guilty by a jury.

338
00:12:38,320 --> 00:12:41,920
And then, yeah, and that will significantly, hopefully

339
00:12:41,920 --> 00:12:43,980
undermine the animal testing industry in the UK.

340
00:12:44,220 --> 00:12:46,600
So there's 20 of us going on trial

341
00:12:47,200 --> 00:12:48,840
over a period of about three or four

342
00:12:48,840 --> 00:12:49,160
months.

343
00:12:49,320 --> 00:12:50,900
So yeah, Ben's in the first trial that

344
00:12:50,900 --> 00:12:52,060
starts on the 1st of December.

345
00:12:52,600 --> 00:12:54,960
And we've been split into groups of four

346
00:12:54,960 --> 00:12:57,940
or five and mine's the fourth trial.

347
00:12:58,060 --> 00:12:59,480
So my trial's in February.

348
00:12:59,480 --> 00:13:00,900
I'm not too worried about it at the

349
00:13:00,900 --> 00:13:02,740
moment, to be honest, I'm quite hopeful.

350
00:13:02,960 --> 00:13:04,020
It seems so common sense.

351
00:13:04,100 --> 00:13:08,480
Yeah, in 2022, there was the opportunity to

352
00:13:08,480 --> 00:13:11,680
go into MBR Acres and do this.

353
00:13:11,860 --> 00:13:13,900
And yeah, of course, to save those individuals

354
00:13:13,900 --> 00:13:17,300
that we did, those 23 puppies, I think

355
00:13:17,300 --> 00:13:19,400
that in and of itself is a really,

356
00:13:19,500 --> 00:13:20,020
really good thing.

357
00:13:20,200 --> 00:13:22,880
But also we did this openly and accountably,

358
00:13:22,900 --> 00:13:24,480
and we wanted it to go to trial

359
00:13:24,480 --> 00:13:27,220
to raise awareness about what's happening to beagles

360
00:13:27,640 --> 00:13:29,960
in animal testing labs still in the UK.

361
00:13:35,470 --> 00:13:37,990
I guess we're just got muted there.

362
00:13:38,230 --> 00:13:40,150
So I'll unmute both of us, but that

363
00:13:40,150 --> 00:13:41,410
is your wife, Rose Patterson.

364
00:13:41,510 --> 00:13:42,810
Her trial hasn't happened yet.

365
00:13:43,350 --> 00:13:46,210
Ben Newman, the gentleman who was speaking was

366
00:13:46,210 --> 00:13:48,950
convicted, I believe in the first trial.

367
00:13:49,130 --> 00:13:52,450
So where does that leave the other trials

368
00:13:52,450 --> 00:13:54,230
and where does it leave the appeal?

369
00:13:54,930 --> 00:13:57,110
Yeah, I mean, I think, okay, so a

370
00:13:57,110 --> 00:13:57,570
couple of things.

371
00:13:57,770 --> 00:14:00,530
One is, again, the first trial was done

372
00:14:00,530 --> 00:14:04,550
under such extraordinary circumstances where the defendants are

373
00:14:04,550 --> 00:14:06,070
getting interrupted in their closing argument.

374
00:14:06,350 --> 00:14:08,410
Lawyers are getting yelled at for just citing

375
00:14:08,410 --> 00:14:09,290
basic facts.

376
00:14:09,990 --> 00:14:11,350
There was such extreme bias.

377
00:14:11,510 --> 00:14:12,790
I don't think you can say much about

378
00:14:12,790 --> 00:14:14,530
that first trial in terms of what that

379
00:14:14,530 --> 00:14:15,430
represents for the future.

380
00:14:16,070 --> 00:14:17,090
The second thing is I think the animal

381
00:14:17,090 --> 00:14:17,870
rights team is just learning.

382
00:14:18,130 --> 00:14:19,750
I think there was a lot of debriefing,

383
00:14:19,790 --> 00:14:21,790
a lot of skillsharing, a lot of conversations

384
00:14:21,790 --> 00:14:24,070
that were had, including across the Atlantic Ocean.

385
00:14:24,150 --> 00:14:25,630
And we had some of the top lawyers

386
00:14:25,630 --> 00:14:27,010
in the United States meeting with some of

387
00:14:27,010 --> 00:14:28,710
the top lawyers in the United Kingdom and

388
00:14:28,710 --> 00:14:29,710
some of the defendants in the United Kingdom

389
00:14:29,710 --> 00:14:32,310
to make sure we understood how to tell

390
00:14:32,310 --> 00:14:33,690
the story of animal rescue.

391
00:14:34,230 --> 00:14:36,410
And the primary line they've been using, I

392
00:14:36,410 --> 00:14:38,030
just think fell flat in this case.

393
00:14:38,650 --> 00:14:41,630
This is the argument that, one, that there's

394
00:14:41,630 --> 00:14:44,250
gonna be some sort of social breakdown if

395
00:14:44,250 --> 00:14:45,250
we don't kill animals.

396
00:14:45,390 --> 00:14:47,830
I mean, it's kind of silly, especially when

397
00:14:47,830 --> 00:14:49,110
it comes to dogs and experiments.

398
00:14:49,230 --> 00:14:50,790
You really think our entire society is gonna

399
00:14:50,790 --> 00:14:51,310
collapse.

400
00:14:51,810 --> 00:14:53,030
And those of us who are vegan who

401
00:14:53,030 --> 00:14:54,790
know this, because we've talked to our non

402
00:14:54,790 --> 00:14:57,050
-vegan friends and they say, oftentimes, this could

403
00:14:57,050 --> 00:14:59,110
be one of the little silly things about

404
00:14:59,110 --> 00:15:01,330
the future of veganism and what veganism would

405
00:15:01,330 --> 00:15:02,970
do to threaten the food supply, to threaten

406
00:15:02,970 --> 00:15:04,070
our way of life.

407
00:15:04,290 --> 00:15:05,630
It's actually not that bad.

408
00:15:05,690 --> 00:15:07,450
Eating tofu instead of beef is just not

409
00:15:07,450 --> 00:15:08,150
that big of a deal.

410
00:15:08,950 --> 00:15:10,610
But the second argument they used over and

411
00:15:10,610 --> 00:15:11,850
over again was this idea, this is just

412
00:15:11,850 --> 00:15:12,730
a publicity stunt.

413
00:15:12,790 --> 00:15:15,630
It's all just crazy, deranged activists who are

414
00:15:15,630 --> 00:15:16,730
trying to tell you what to do.

415
00:15:17,250 --> 00:15:18,950
And I thought the counter that was used

416
00:15:18,950 --> 00:15:20,590
this time, which frankly is just the truth

417
00:15:20,590 --> 00:15:22,690
about who we are, was humility.

418
00:15:23,310 --> 00:15:25,650
The activists did a just extraordinary job of

419
00:15:25,650 --> 00:15:27,770
showing vulnerability and showing, we're not trying to

420
00:15:27,770 --> 00:15:28,410
tell you what to do.

421
00:15:28,410 --> 00:15:29,770
We're not saying we're better than you.

422
00:15:30,110 --> 00:15:31,270
We just wanted to help some dogs.

423
00:15:31,630 --> 00:15:33,890
And the reason we needed this publicity wasn't

424
00:15:33,890 --> 00:15:36,650
because we're narcissists who just want attention.

425
00:15:36,850 --> 00:15:38,990
It's because we knew the only way we

426
00:15:38,990 --> 00:15:40,930
could convince the public that something has to

427
00:15:40,930 --> 00:15:42,670
be done for these dogs is to show

428
00:15:42,670 --> 00:15:43,130
you the truth.

429
00:15:43,230 --> 00:15:44,410
The government's not willing to tell you the

430
00:15:44,410 --> 00:15:44,650
truth.

431
00:15:45,030 --> 00:15:46,630
The industry certainly isn't willing to tell you

432
00:15:46,630 --> 00:15:46,910
the truth.

433
00:15:47,250 --> 00:15:48,250
We will tell you the truth.

434
00:15:48,590 --> 00:15:50,110
And that made the jury feel like we're

435
00:15:50,110 --> 00:15:51,070
all on the same side here.

436
00:15:51,150 --> 00:15:52,450
And I thought it was extraordinarily effective.

437
00:15:52,530 --> 00:15:54,010
It's one of the reasons we got the

438
00:15:54,010 --> 00:15:55,770
not guilty verdict we got today.

439
00:15:55,890 --> 00:15:57,930
The good thing is in the longterm, that

440
00:15:57,930 --> 00:15:58,950
is the way all these trials are gonna

441
00:15:58,950 --> 00:15:59,110
run.

442
00:15:59,190 --> 00:16:00,470
I don't think the prosecution has any way

443
00:16:00,470 --> 00:16:02,510
to counter that because when one side is

444
00:16:02,510 --> 00:16:04,330
all about transparency and truth, the other side

445
00:16:04,330 --> 00:16:05,530
is all about, no, no, no, no.

446
00:16:05,570 --> 00:16:06,910
You can't hear anything about the experiments.

447
00:16:07,350 --> 00:16:09,930
You can't even hear about the defendant's motivations

448
00:16:09,930 --> 00:16:10,890
for what they did.

449
00:16:11,250 --> 00:16:13,110
Then the side that's transparent is gonna win

450
00:16:13,110 --> 00:16:13,670
in the longterm.

451
00:16:14,750 --> 00:16:17,150
Just wanna ask you, of course, as this

452
00:16:17,150 --> 00:16:19,790
is going on, we also have Zoe Rosenberg,

453
00:16:19,810 --> 00:16:26,210
you're seeing here, who is a Berkeley University

454
00:16:26,210 --> 00:16:31,050
graduate, a straight A student, and she rescued

455
00:16:31,050 --> 00:16:31,990
four chickens.

456
00:16:31,990 --> 00:16:34,230
You can see the rescue in an open

457
00:16:34,230 --> 00:16:36,570
rescue because this was distributed to the public,

458
00:16:36,690 --> 00:16:37,270
this footage.

459
00:16:37,710 --> 00:16:41,970
She was convicted and she did less than

460
00:16:41,970 --> 00:16:44,730
a month in physical jail, but now she

461
00:16:44,730 --> 00:16:49,910
is under house arrest or maybe it technically

462
00:16:49,910 --> 00:16:51,570
is not the start of house arrest, but

463
00:16:51,570 --> 00:16:52,410
it'll start soon.

464
00:16:52,810 --> 00:16:54,950
Suffice it to say, she's not able to

465
00:16:54,950 --> 00:16:57,110
go out and about her business.

466
00:16:58,790 --> 00:17:03,230
So how does the UK Beagle Rescue Trial,

467
00:17:03,750 --> 00:17:06,910
not guilty verdicts affect the animal rights movement

468
00:17:06,910 --> 00:17:08,349
in the United States?

469
00:17:09,290 --> 00:17:11,790
I think that this is going to set

470
00:17:11,790 --> 00:17:16,050
off a chain reaction against vivisection because the

471
00:17:16,050 --> 00:17:17,990
reality is in many ways, the facts of

472
00:17:17,990 --> 00:17:19,470
this case are not ideal.

473
00:17:20,410 --> 00:17:23,670
For example, the UK government has said over

474
00:17:23,670 --> 00:17:25,829
and over again that the facility is legal

475
00:17:25,829 --> 00:17:28,270
and the reality is that the audits suggest

476
00:17:28,270 --> 00:17:30,050
that the facility actually did comply with the

477
00:17:30,050 --> 00:17:30,310
law.

478
00:17:30,850 --> 00:17:32,690
In contrast, in the United States, almost all

479
00:17:32,690 --> 00:17:34,850
the vivisection facilities that issue, whether it's Ridgeland

480
00:17:34,850 --> 00:17:36,830
or MBR, because MBR is actually a company

481
00:17:36,830 --> 00:17:37,370
in the United States.

482
00:17:37,490 --> 00:17:39,990
They actually have a massively larger facility in

483
00:17:39,990 --> 00:17:40,670
upstate New York.

484
00:17:41,170 --> 00:17:42,750
There are lots of violations that have been

485
00:17:42,750 --> 00:17:45,850
documented against vivisectors in the United States.

486
00:17:45,930 --> 00:17:47,310
At all the facilities, we might want to

487
00:17:47,310 --> 00:17:48,150
target with an open rescue.

488
00:17:49,010 --> 00:17:50,630
A second factor is just the evidence of

489
00:17:50,630 --> 00:17:51,930
the condition of the specific animals.

490
00:17:51,930 --> 00:17:54,670
In Ridgeland, we had extensive evidence that the

491
00:17:54,670 --> 00:17:57,810
individual animals we saved, including Julie, this psychotic

492
00:17:57,810 --> 00:17:59,090
beagle who had been trapped in a two

493
00:17:59,090 --> 00:17:59,870
foot by four foot cage.

494
00:18:00,150 --> 00:18:01,590
I mean, these conditions are horrible and awful,

495
00:18:01,870 --> 00:18:04,430
but frankly, compared to American vivisection, UK vivisection

496
00:18:04,430 --> 00:18:06,870
is almost like a luxury house, right?

497
00:18:06,890 --> 00:18:09,090
Because these animals aren't caged in individual cages.

498
00:18:09,270 --> 00:18:11,110
They're not trapped in two foot by four

499
00:18:11,110 --> 00:18:13,130
foot metal wire flooring where they have to

500
00:18:13,130 --> 00:18:15,190
live for seven, eight years of their life.

501
00:18:15,890 --> 00:18:18,130
And yet in the UK, they've proven you

502
00:18:18,130 --> 00:18:20,290
can show people conditions like this, which they're

503
00:18:20,290 --> 00:18:22,150
not great, but they're not as awful and

504
00:18:22,150 --> 00:18:24,750
just psychotic and terrifying as the conditions in

505
00:18:24,750 --> 00:18:26,930
US vivisection facilities, and you can still win.

506
00:18:27,170 --> 00:18:28,750
So I think what this is going to

507
00:18:28,750 --> 00:18:30,070
do is it's going to set a precedent.

508
00:18:30,190 --> 00:18:32,370
Frankly, this is not just theoretical.

509
00:18:32,630 --> 00:18:34,170
There are already plans being made to go

510
00:18:34,170 --> 00:18:35,790
back to Ridgeland to take all 3,000

511
00:18:35,790 --> 00:18:36,350
dogs out.

512
00:18:36,690 --> 00:18:37,870
This case is going to light a fire

513
00:18:37,870 --> 00:18:39,630
into the movement and inspire more people to

514
00:18:39,630 --> 00:18:40,730
get out to Ridgeland because if they can

515
00:18:40,730 --> 00:18:42,410
win at MBR, we can win at Ridgeland

516
00:18:42,410 --> 00:18:42,650
again.

517
00:18:42,950 --> 00:18:44,410
We need to get people out there and

518
00:18:44,410 --> 00:18:46,210
start taking the dogs out.

519
00:18:46,850 --> 00:18:49,170
And for those who do not have any

520
00:18:49,170 --> 00:18:52,870
information about Ridgeland, this is in Dane County,

521
00:18:54,270 --> 00:18:55,610
Minnesota, I believe.

522
00:18:55,970 --> 00:18:56,670
Is it Minnesota?

523
00:18:57,010 --> 00:18:58,050
Wisconsin, Wisconsin.

524
00:18:58,510 --> 00:19:00,990
Sorry, I used to live in Minnesota for

525
00:19:00,990 --> 00:19:01,710
a couple of years.

526
00:19:01,910 --> 00:19:05,030
And so it's the next state over, Wisconsin.

527
00:19:05,570 --> 00:19:09,210
And there's a very large dog breeding facility

528
00:19:09,210 --> 00:19:09,790
there.

529
00:19:10,170 --> 00:19:12,350
And you actually went in there.

530
00:19:12,410 --> 00:19:13,870
I wish I had the video to show,

531
00:19:14,410 --> 00:19:17,850
but you documented the conditions and you were

532
00:19:17,850 --> 00:19:18,550
charged.

533
00:19:18,550 --> 00:19:20,410
Then they dropped the charges.

534
00:19:20,650 --> 00:19:23,110
And instead of you sort of saying, whoo,

535
00:19:23,110 --> 00:19:24,130
that was a close one.

536
00:19:24,470 --> 00:19:26,290
I don't have to worry about being criminally

537
00:19:26,290 --> 00:19:26,630
charged.

538
00:19:26,710 --> 00:19:29,750
You went back to that county and you

539
00:19:29,750 --> 00:19:35,270
managed to get a special prosecutor appointed to

540
00:19:35,270 --> 00:19:36,710
investigate the facility.

541
00:19:37,550 --> 00:19:39,030
Will you just give us the update on

542
00:19:39,030 --> 00:19:39,270
that?

543
00:19:39,310 --> 00:19:41,530
Because that is something that I believe is

544
00:19:41,530 --> 00:19:44,450
still ongoing in a certain manner of speaking.

545
00:19:44,730 --> 00:19:48,070
And it was a huge victory.

546
00:19:48,070 --> 00:19:49,810
You got that special prosecutor.

547
00:19:50,270 --> 00:19:52,150
Yeah, not only did we get the special

548
00:19:52,150 --> 00:19:54,270
prosecutor, but recently Ridgeland announced that they had

549
00:19:54,270 --> 00:19:55,870
reached an agreement with the special prosecutor to

550
00:19:55,870 --> 00:19:59,030
shut down the breeding facility by July 1st,

551
00:19:59,110 --> 00:20:02,810
2026 in exchange for the prosecutor not filing

552
00:20:02,810 --> 00:20:04,130
any felony charges against him.

553
00:20:04,230 --> 00:20:06,510
And the special prosecutor simultaneously released a report

554
00:20:06,510 --> 00:20:10,190
indicating what was just obvious, which is that

555
00:20:10,190 --> 00:20:12,370
Ridgeland has committed hundreds of felony acts of

556
00:20:12,370 --> 00:20:15,970
animal abuse against innocent defenseless dogs, including things

557
00:20:15,970 --> 00:20:19,530
like mutilating dogs, and surgical procedures that were

558
00:20:19,530 --> 00:20:21,950
done by non-vets without any anesthesia.

559
00:20:22,430 --> 00:20:25,270
Imagine performing a surgery on a living, conscious

560
00:20:25,270 --> 00:20:28,130
being without anesthesia by a non-vet.

561
00:20:28,370 --> 00:20:30,750
All those steps of the process are totally

562
00:20:30,750 --> 00:20:31,070
illegal.

563
00:20:32,310 --> 00:20:33,430
So the downside is- And by the

564
00:20:33,430 --> 00:20:35,810
way, I just want to say that Unchained

565
00:20:35,810 --> 00:20:38,090
TV was the pool camera and had a

566
00:20:38,090 --> 00:20:38,730
camera in court.

567
00:20:38,890 --> 00:20:40,670
And we were there as somebody took the

568
00:20:40,670 --> 00:20:43,550
stand and testified that they themselves saw it.

569
00:20:43,630 --> 00:20:46,270
It's not you just saying that you heard

570
00:20:46,270 --> 00:20:48,270
this, that there were people who were there

571
00:20:48,270 --> 00:20:50,450
who testified in court to that effect.

572
00:20:50,710 --> 00:20:52,010
There were people who were part of those

573
00:20:52,010 --> 00:20:52,510
procedures.

574
00:20:52,670 --> 00:20:54,650
Matt Reich and Scott Gilbertson both testified that

575
00:20:54,650 --> 00:20:55,210
we were employees.

576
00:20:55,490 --> 00:20:56,410
We didn't know what we were doing.

577
00:20:56,490 --> 00:20:57,870
We didn't know it was illegal, but we

578
00:20:57,870 --> 00:20:59,170
were forced to do this as a matter

579
00:20:59,170 --> 00:20:59,730
of employment.

580
00:20:59,910 --> 00:21:01,330
And they told even more horrible stories.

581
00:21:01,690 --> 00:21:03,670
Matt Reich told a story about seeing a

582
00:21:03,670 --> 00:21:05,890
newborn puppy who was kind of sick, just

583
00:21:05,890 --> 00:21:07,630
thrown into a freezer bag, being sent into

584
00:21:07,630 --> 00:21:08,650
the landfill, right?

585
00:21:08,690 --> 00:21:10,730
This is a living puppy that was sent

586
00:21:10,730 --> 00:21:11,830
into a garbage can.

587
00:21:11,870 --> 00:21:12,790
And he said, what are we doing?

588
00:21:12,910 --> 00:21:13,950
Don't we have to do something about this

589
00:21:13,950 --> 00:21:14,190
puppy?

590
00:21:14,490 --> 00:21:15,810
But because the puppy was sick and they

591
00:21:15,810 --> 00:21:17,290
didn't want to waste money on trying to

592
00:21:17,290 --> 00:21:18,890
care for this animal because it's a business

593
00:21:18,890 --> 00:21:22,010
and every $100, $200 they're spending cuts into

594
00:21:22,010 --> 00:21:23,810
their bottom line, they literally just threw an

595
00:21:23,810 --> 00:21:24,750
animal away into a landfill.

596
00:21:25,450 --> 00:21:27,490
And they did prosecute us initially for exposing

597
00:21:27,490 --> 00:21:28,850
this facility and rescuing some animals.

598
00:21:28,950 --> 00:21:31,070
We turned the tables on them, mostly because

599
00:21:31,070 --> 00:21:31,890
of you.

600
00:21:32,270 --> 00:21:34,370
I mean, not literally you, Shane, but you

601
00:21:34,370 --> 00:21:35,570
and all your audience and all the other

602
00:21:35,570 --> 00:21:37,010
animal advocates around the world who came out

603
00:21:37,010 --> 00:21:38,750
to Wisconsin and said, this is not okay.

604
00:21:39,050 --> 00:21:41,490
You can't cover up animal abuse for decades,

605
00:21:42,490 --> 00:21:44,970
attack the people who expose it, and then

606
00:21:44,970 --> 00:21:47,690
prosecute them for rescuing a blind beagle puppy

607
00:21:47,690 --> 00:21:48,210
from a cage.

608
00:21:48,930 --> 00:21:51,330
And partly because of the outcry, the court

609
00:21:51,330 --> 00:21:53,090
not only had to drop charges against us,

610
00:21:53,090 --> 00:21:55,310
but appointed this special prosecutor who has said

611
00:21:55,310 --> 00:21:56,510
now they're going to shut down by July

612
00:21:56,510 --> 00:21:56,910
1st.

613
00:21:57,090 --> 00:21:59,530
Now, the wrinkle that is a very bad

614
00:21:59,530 --> 00:22:01,130
one for us is twofold.

615
00:22:01,250 --> 00:22:04,730
One is technically Ridgeland can continue to sell

616
00:22:04,730 --> 00:22:07,250
and torture and kill dogs until July 1st,

617
00:22:07,250 --> 00:22:09,330
which means all the thousands of dogs there

618
00:22:09,330 --> 00:22:11,590
may end up dead, even though the government

619
00:22:11,590 --> 00:22:13,530
has now acknowledged there are victims of felony

620
00:22:13,530 --> 00:22:14,070
animal abuse.

621
00:22:14,070 --> 00:22:15,130
That makes no sense.

622
00:22:15,270 --> 00:22:17,310
If this were an animal cruelty case involving

623
00:22:17,310 --> 00:22:19,650
anyone other than a big, powerful, wealthy industry

624
00:22:19,650 --> 00:22:22,230
the dogs would have been confiscated a year

625
00:22:22,230 --> 00:22:23,010
ago, right?

626
00:22:23,130 --> 00:22:24,910
But the second piece of this is extremely

627
00:22:24,910 --> 00:22:27,610
problematic is when we first got a copy

628
00:22:27,610 --> 00:22:29,470
of the stipulation, the agreement with the prosecutor,

629
00:22:30,030 --> 00:22:31,750
we wrote back to him and said, look,

630
00:22:31,870 --> 00:22:34,670
this doesn't stop the company from just rebranding

631
00:22:34,670 --> 00:22:36,310
under different entities' names.

632
00:22:36,450 --> 00:22:39,150
They can reincorporate a new entity, could be

633
00:22:39,150 --> 00:22:40,890
exactly the same one, and just shift the

634
00:22:40,890 --> 00:22:42,430
entire facility to this new ownership.

635
00:22:42,430 --> 00:22:43,970
And he completely blew us off.

636
00:22:44,270 --> 00:22:45,490
I can tell you as a corporate lawyer,

637
00:22:45,530 --> 00:22:47,350
this is exactly what evil corporations do.

638
00:22:47,430 --> 00:22:48,210
That's what they do all the time.

639
00:22:48,250 --> 00:22:49,890
Because I sued corporations because of this sort

640
00:22:49,890 --> 00:22:50,110
of thing.

641
00:22:50,310 --> 00:22:51,470
I know a lot about this.

642
00:22:51,790 --> 00:22:53,050
And he completely ignored the email.

643
00:22:53,870 --> 00:22:55,590
And initially I thought, honestly, it was just

644
00:22:55,590 --> 00:22:56,650
laziness and incompetence.

645
00:22:56,830 --> 00:22:58,490
But after we got a filing a couple

646
00:22:58,490 --> 00:23:00,270
of weeks ago, and we looked at it

647
00:23:00,270 --> 00:23:03,310
very carefully, that indicated what the basis of

648
00:23:03,310 --> 00:23:06,310
his declining filing of felony charges against Ridgeland

649
00:23:06,310 --> 00:23:08,170
was, what the basis was for him deciding

650
00:23:08,170 --> 00:23:08,970
not to seize the dogs.

651
00:23:08,970 --> 00:23:12,530
We realized he has unlawfully been collaborating with

652
00:23:12,530 --> 00:23:13,910
the industry this entire time.

653
00:23:14,470 --> 00:23:15,870
He should have had no context with the

654
00:23:15,870 --> 00:23:18,410
industry, no context with anyone who was adversarial

655
00:23:18,410 --> 00:23:19,730
to the interests of the victims of this

656
00:23:19,730 --> 00:23:20,370
case, the dogs.

657
00:23:20,570 --> 00:23:22,690
And instead, while he was denying us the

658
00:23:22,690 --> 00:23:24,350
opportunity to share our facts, he didn't even

659
00:23:24,350 --> 00:23:25,850
talk to the employees who saw this abuse.

660
00:23:25,910 --> 00:23:28,050
He didn't talk to our expert veterinarians who

661
00:23:28,050 --> 00:23:28,970
opined on this abuse.

662
00:23:29,310 --> 00:23:30,770
He had been spending all this time talking

663
00:23:30,770 --> 00:23:32,330
to factory farming interests in Wisconsin.

664
00:23:32,670 --> 00:23:34,690
That is illegal, that is unconstitutional.

665
00:23:35,230 --> 00:23:36,930
And so our ask now to the government

666
00:23:36,930 --> 00:23:39,450
is, get all of those dogs out or

667
00:23:39,450 --> 00:23:40,350
we will.

668
00:23:41,330 --> 00:23:44,410
Well, I know I've worked with other organizations

669
00:23:44,790 --> 00:23:50,330
like Beagle Freedom Project that has actually gotten

670
00:23:50,330 --> 00:23:53,090
dogs that have been taken from labs, adopted.

671
00:23:53,310 --> 00:23:55,490
So there are people out there who will

672
00:23:55,490 --> 00:23:56,650
adopt these dogs.

673
00:23:57,150 --> 00:24:00,790
Indeed, Beagle Freedom Project got Meghan Markle and

674
00:24:00,790 --> 00:24:03,450
Prince Harry to adopt a dog that had

675
00:24:03,450 --> 00:24:07,950
been experimented on or in a laboratory breeding

676
00:24:07,950 --> 00:24:09,930
facility for laboratory dogs.

677
00:24:10,110 --> 00:24:12,150
So I just wanna thank you, Wayne.

678
00:24:12,230 --> 00:24:13,510
I know you're a very busy person.

679
00:24:13,670 --> 00:24:15,730
I know it's very late in London.

680
00:24:16,650 --> 00:24:17,630
Final thoughts.

681
00:24:18,030 --> 00:24:21,650
Here we are sort of maybe back on

682
00:24:21,650 --> 00:24:23,130
our heels a little bit as a movement.

683
00:24:23,630 --> 00:24:26,650
You have the new food pyramid that emphasizes

684
00:24:26,650 --> 00:24:28,590
meat and dairy that came out of nowhere

685
00:24:28,590 --> 00:24:31,050
with a lot of meat industry influence.

686
00:24:31,440 --> 00:24:34,910
You have a media war against veganism going

687
00:24:34,910 --> 00:24:37,810
on with a master's in beef advocacy where

688
00:24:37,810 --> 00:24:40,350
they're churning out these social media influencers to

689
00:24:40,350 --> 00:24:40,950
pump up meat.

690
00:24:41,930 --> 00:24:44,750
You have the fact that the first Animal

691
00:24:44,750 --> 00:24:48,510
Rising group was convicted and poor Zoe Rosenberg

692
00:24:48,510 --> 00:24:52,030
is in, she's lost her freedom and had

693
00:24:52,030 --> 00:24:53,150
to wear an ankle monitor.

694
00:24:54,070 --> 00:24:57,170
Given all of that, I know you're a

695
00:24:57,170 --> 00:24:59,130
person who sees big picture long-term.

696
00:24:59,530 --> 00:25:02,850
How strong is our animal rights movement?

697
00:25:03,550 --> 00:25:05,390
The movement is stronger than it's ever been.

698
00:25:05,750 --> 00:25:07,050
And not just because of this verdict.

699
00:25:07,570 --> 00:25:09,310
Frankly, even the things that we see as

700
00:25:09,310 --> 00:25:12,470
defeats like Zoe's case, there's a boomerang effect

701
00:25:12,470 --> 00:25:16,410
where you pull back and suddenly when the

702
00:25:16,410 --> 00:25:19,150
industry pulls back too far and we realize

703
00:25:19,150 --> 00:25:21,310
that the public is actually not down for

704
00:25:21,310 --> 00:25:23,230
a lot of the industry practices.

705
00:25:23,490 --> 00:25:25,330
It's not down for lying to people about

706
00:25:25,330 --> 00:25:27,150
the health costs of red meat.

707
00:25:27,150 --> 00:25:29,230
It's not down for trying to lie to

708
00:25:29,230 --> 00:25:31,790
people about how cultivated meat or beyond meat

709
00:25:31,790 --> 00:25:32,650
is somehow dangerous.

710
00:25:32,950 --> 00:25:34,390
And it's certainly not down for putting animal

711
00:25:34,390 --> 00:25:35,190
rescuers in trial.

712
00:25:35,710 --> 00:25:39,190
When they overreach and push back, the slingshot

713
00:25:39,190 --> 00:25:42,330
effect of that boomerang, that whiplash actually propels

714
00:25:42,330 --> 00:25:42,690
us forward.

715
00:25:43,010 --> 00:25:44,450
And I can say this as someone who's

716
00:25:44,450 --> 00:25:47,170
lived through that experience because back in 2009,

717
00:25:47,270 --> 00:25:50,730
2010, I was a lawyer advocating for animals

718
00:25:50,730 --> 00:25:51,830
back then as I am today.

719
00:25:51,890 --> 00:25:53,490
And the entire movement felt like it was

720
00:25:53,490 --> 00:25:55,650
in collapse because of the ATA, all the

721
00:25:55,650 --> 00:25:56,890
actives who had gone to prison in the

722
00:25:56,890 --> 00:25:59,350
United States in the 2000s, because the Ag

723
00:25:59,350 --> 00:26:00,890
-Gag laws that are being passed across the

724
00:26:00,890 --> 00:26:02,810
country, veganism was in free fall.

725
00:26:02,910 --> 00:26:04,830
No one seemed to be doing anything successfully.

726
00:26:05,390 --> 00:26:07,310
And I told folks back then, and I'll

727
00:26:07,310 --> 00:26:09,950
tell folks again today, just you wait, because

728
00:26:09,950 --> 00:26:11,370
it's always darkest before the dawn.

729
00:26:11,710 --> 00:26:14,090
And in fact, sometimes the contrast of the

730
00:26:14,090 --> 00:26:16,830
vileness of the industry, the repression the industry

731
00:26:16,830 --> 00:26:19,570
is inflicting on ordinary people is precisely what

732
00:26:19,570 --> 00:26:20,310
propels us forward.

733
00:26:20,390 --> 00:26:21,310
And I think that's what we're gonna see

734
00:26:21,310 --> 00:26:21,790
in this case.

735
00:26:22,410 --> 00:26:24,750
Well, from your mouth to God's ear, as

736
00:26:24,750 --> 00:26:27,270
the saying goes, it's so great to talk

737
00:26:27,270 --> 00:26:27,530
to you.

738
00:26:27,710 --> 00:26:29,770
Thank you for taking the time at this

739
00:26:29,770 --> 00:26:32,310
late hour, live from England, everybody.

740
00:26:32,470 --> 00:26:37,650
Wayne Chung talking about this incredible, incredible positive

741
00:26:37,650 --> 00:26:43,850
outcome in this trial, namely the acquittal of

742
00:26:43,850 --> 00:26:46,390
these four defendants.

743
00:26:46,650 --> 00:26:48,450
And we'll have to see what happens with

744
00:26:48,450 --> 00:26:49,130
the next case.

745
00:26:49,270 --> 00:26:50,790
We will stay on top of it.

746
00:26:50,790 --> 00:26:52,570
We will see you next time.

747
00:26:52,710 --> 00:26:55,290
And thank you for watching Unchained TV.

748
00:26:55,510 --> 00:26:58,630
Please support the Simple Heart, Wayne Chung's blog.

749
00:26:59,270 --> 00:26:59,490
It's an incredible blog.

750
00:26:59,490 --> 00:27:00,910
And go to Animal Rising's website.

751
00:27:01,950 --> 00:27:02,550
Absolutely.

752
00:27:02,870 --> 00:27:05,830
And Animal Rising, we must support Animal Rising

753
00:27:05,830 --> 00:27:07,150
in the United Kingdom.

754
00:27:07,590 --> 00:27:08,690
See you next time.

755
00:27:09,310 --> 00:27:09,590
Awesome.

756
00:27:09,830 --> 00:27:11,810
So it's a vegan Netflix.

757
00:27:12,130 --> 00:27:13,990
Okay, that's the craziest thing I've ever heard.

758
00:27:14,010 --> 00:27:15,250
I love Unchained TV.

759
00:27:15,510 --> 00:27:17,270
Unchained, Unchained TV.

760
00:27:17,430 --> 00:27:18,230
Your life will change.

761
00:27:18,350 --> 00:27:19,410
It's just that easy.

762
00:27:19,410 --> 00:27:22,250
Unchained TV has all sorts of content for

763
00:27:22,250 --> 00:27:22,750
everybody.

764
00:27:23,130 --> 00:27:25,170
Unchained TV changed my life.

765
00:27:25,530 --> 00:27:28,270
Unchained TV is crushing it.

766
00:27:28,410 --> 00:27:29,970
I love Unchained TV.

767
00:27:30,230 --> 00:27:31,970
Unchained TV is my go-to.

768
00:27:32,310 --> 00:27:33,070
Unchained TV.

769
00:27:33,530 --> 00:27:34,090
Who knew?

770
00:27:34,650 --> 00:27:36,690
Unchained, baby, yay!